Your mobile app, your partner integrations, and your open banking interfaces all run on APIs. We can help you test them the way an attacker would.
A decade ago, an attacker who wanted into a Nigerian financial institution would go through the website. Today the website is often the least interesting door. Most applications now call an API client. The USSD gateway calls an API. Every aggregator, payment switch, and partner integration is another set of endpoints, each one accepting requests from outside your network, around the clock.
Open banking widens this surface deliberately. The CBN's open banking guidelines expect banks to expose customer-permissioned account and payment services to licensed third parties through standard interfaces. That is good for competition and uncomfortable for anyone who still assumes the security perimeter ends at the login page. Each published endpoint is a potential entry point, and doors can be abused.
The flaws that matter are rarely exotic. An endpoint that returns another customer's record when one digit changes in the request, a transfer request that does not check the acount to be debited belongs to the caller. Nothing in these requests is 'malformed' per say, so scanners would not flag them as issues. Finding issues like this takes human-led penetration testing by people who read an API the way an attacker does. AI helps correlate endpoints, parameters, and repeated response patterns across a large API environment. Our senior penetration testers use those leads to test authorization and business rules directly, then verify the impact by hand.
Every endpoint is examined individually and as part of the request sequences your business actually runs. The categories below map to the OWASP API Security Top 10.
OAuth and JWT handling, token expiry and revocation, key management, and whether machine-to-machine credentials can be replayed or forged.
BOLA and IDOR: can one customer read or modify another's data, and can a low-privileged user reach admin-only functions.
Abuse across various attack chains: initiating a transfer, altering it mid-flow, replaying a callback, or skipping a verification step entirely.
Whether OTP endpoints, login flows, and enumeration-prone lookups can be brute forced, and whether expensive queries can exhaust the service.
Injection into parameters, headers, and payloads; mass assignment; and server-side request forgery through URLs the API fetches on your behalf.
Responses that return more fields than the client needs, verbose errors, and stale or undocumented endpoint versions still answering in production.
Still the backbone of Nigerian fintech. We map every route, including the undocumented ones, then test each resource for authorization gaps, mass assignment, and version drift between versions of the same endpoint.
A single endpoint hiding an entire schema. Introspection left on in production, deeply nested queries that stall the resolver, batching that defeats rate limits, and field-level authorization flaws.
The calls your platform receives are as dangerous as the ones it makes. We test whether inbound webhooks verify signatures, whether payment confirmations can be forged or replayed, and whether an attacker can point your outbound callbacks at a server they control.
No finding enters a ClarenSec report without re-verification. Each issue is exploited by hand, and exploitation is demonstrated to the last non-destructive step, and the report carries the full request and response as evidence. Your engineers will see the requests that broke your application, the parameter that caused the app to break, and the fixes to be implemented. Severity follows CVSS, adjusted where the business context carries more impact.
The engagement follows a testing methodology that is similar to PTES, OWASP, and NIST SP 800-115, and it does not end at the report. Once your team applies fixes, we retest each finding and issue a retest report stating the findings that have actually been verified fixed, and those that remain.
An API pentest can stand alone. However, most engagements pair it with web application penetration testing or a mobile app penetration test, since the client applications and the endpoints share one trust boundary. Fintechs preparing for partner due diligence or a licensing conversation can read how we approach fintech security testing as a whole.
An executive summary written for management, a technical report with reproduction steps for every finding, a remediation plan ordered by risk, and one round of retesting at no additional cost. Where the test supports a regulatory or partner requirement, the report is structured for submission.
As at the retest date, you also receive a closure statement listing each finding, its fix status, and the verification performed. Boards and auditors ask for this document more often than the original report.
A web application test works through the interface your users see. An API test works below it, on the endpoints themselves. Many authorization flaws are invisible from the front end because the interface hides the 'buttons'; however, the endpoint behind them still answers. The two tests complement each other, and for most platforms we recommend scoping them together.
All three. REST remains the most common, and GraphQL brings its own problems: introspection left enabled in production, nested queries that exhaust the server, and field-level authorization gaps. Webhooks are tested from both directions, whether your platform verifies signatures on inbound requests and whether outbound requests can be redirected or replayed.
An API specification if one exists (OpenAPI, Swagger, or a Postman collection), test accounts at each privilege level, and a contact who can answer questions about intended behaviour. Where documentation is thin we map the API from the client applications, though testing goes faster and deeper with a specification in hand.
We prefer a staging environment that mirrors production, and most clients provide one. Where production is the only option, we agree rate limits, excluded operations, and test windows in writing before any request is sent, and destructive tests are not executed.
Send us your endpoint count and a rough architecture sketch, and we will come back with a scoped plan and timeline within a few business days.